Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 2:12:33 GMT -5
For years the foundation sector, but especially that dedicated to serving third parties, is subject to a very complex tax regime that has various “locks”, among them they cannot proselytize either politically or religiously. But why did the Rosenblueth Foundation lend itself to the farce of the airport consultation? Because it is not subject to that legal framework because it is self-benefiting. Analysts, researchers and legislators, among others, have held discussions about the legality of the consultation "if it did not meet the requirements of the law, if it is not prohibited it is allowed, if it is binding or not", etc. It was an exercise by individuals where a party, at the wishes of a person who still has no legal responsibility for the country, called for this consultation that was done as a matter of course. The participation of the Rosenblueth Foundation reveals that precisely, more than ever, the country requires clear institutions and defined rules to act. In this space, “Business Foundations” has dedicated itself for years to pointing out and even denouncing facts that contravene the interests of the civil society sector that is dedicated to serving third parties, also known as the philanthropic sector, and that, due to a lack of clarity, many organizations self-profit organizations have great room for maneuver to perform “services” like the one requested by the new government from said association.
Regardless of the process and the result of this Finland Mobile Number List consultation, what draws attention is the role that the Rosenblueth Foundation played due to the partiality of its president, Enrique Calderón Alzati. Those who had the opportunity to listen to him in the days prior to the consultation when he was interviewed in different media, were able to testify to his visceral reaction, pointing out to his critics why in the past they had not aroused reactions against previous governments when at their trial “the people” should have been consulted showing an attitude of “now comes ours.” In this space it is considered that the exercise of journalism and communication cannot be “objective” and purely neutral, because precisely what makes its exercise valuable are the different approaches, the subjective as it characterizes this profession. But if we draw attention to the risk of fostering, with certain comments, attitudes of resentment, ridicule and revenge, which in the long run lead to intolerance, persecuting those who do not think the same and minimizing the point of view of other people, quite the opposite of the essence of philanthropic work and contribution. From the Board of Directors The president of the Board of Directors pointed out that this Monday, November 5, Fundación Banorte will hold the “Preschool Leadership and Innovation Forum”, which is part of the “Banorte Educational Leaders” program, which will take place on November 5 and 6 at the World Trade Center in Mexico City.
This meeting, said the president, has three axes of work: Leadership and Management, Trends and Innovation in Preschool and Early Childhood Development with the objective of offering 1,000 preschool managers a space for training, reflection and dialogue in order to build an experience quality learning and influencing the comprehensive development of boys and girls. The Banorte Foundation will recognize best school leadership practices. The Treasurer commented on information published by journalist Edgar Guzmán Uribe a few days ago where he addresses the situation of the Mary Street Jenkins Foundation. Edgar remembers that the authorization as an authorized donee was revoked since 2015, but what he provides is another indication about how the board was able to maneuver to take the money from the Puebla Foundation and open the Philanthropy Welfare Foundation (FBF) in Aguascalientes. Then transfer the resources to Barbados and from there to Panama to create a “foundation” as a corporation in that country that allows them to use the assets for private family purposes. The journalist from Puebla talks about the Jenkins family Astead had a double Federal Taxpayer Registry, with which he turned the SHCP around.
Regardless of the process and the result of this Finland Mobile Number List consultation, what draws attention is the role that the Rosenblueth Foundation played due to the partiality of its president, Enrique Calderón Alzati. Those who had the opportunity to listen to him in the days prior to the consultation when he was interviewed in different media, were able to testify to his visceral reaction, pointing out to his critics why in the past they had not aroused reactions against previous governments when at their trial “the people” should have been consulted showing an attitude of “now comes ours.” In this space it is considered that the exercise of journalism and communication cannot be “objective” and purely neutral, because precisely what makes its exercise valuable are the different approaches, the subjective as it characterizes this profession. But if we draw attention to the risk of fostering, with certain comments, attitudes of resentment, ridicule and revenge, which in the long run lead to intolerance, persecuting those who do not think the same and minimizing the point of view of other people, quite the opposite of the essence of philanthropic work and contribution. From the Board of Directors The president of the Board of Directors pointed out that this Monday, November 5, Fundación Banorte will hold the “Preschool Leadership and Innovation Forum”, which is part of the “Banorte Educational Leaders” program, which will take place on November 5 and 6 at the World Trade Center in Mexico City.
This meeting, said the president, has three axes of work: Leadership and Management, Trends and Innovation in Preschool and Early Childhood Development with the objective of offering 1,000 preschool managers a space for training, reflection and dialogue in order to build an experience quality learning and influencing the comprehensive development of boys and girls. The Banorte Foundation will recognize best school leadership practices. The Treasurer commented on information published by journalist Edgar Guzmán Uribe a few days ago where he addresses the situation of the Mary Street Jenkins Foundation. Edgar remembers that the authorization as an authorized donee was revoked since 2015, but what he provides is another indication about how the board was able to maneuver to take the money from the Puebla Foundation and open the Philanthropy Welfare Foundation (FBF) in Aguascalientes. Then transfer the resources to Barbados and from there to Panama to create a “foundation” as a corporation in that country that allows them to use the assets for private family purposes. The journalist from Puebla talks about the Jenkins family Astead had a double Federal Taxpayer Registry, with which he turned the SHCP around.